نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشکده امام علی (ع)، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

نتایج تحقیقات فراوانی نشان می‌دهد که راهبرد آمریکا در سال‌های اخیر در قبال منطقه غرب آسیا دچار تغییرات گوناگونی شده است. خلق تروریسم نوپدید داعش و حمایت‌های مالی، اطلاعاتی، نظامی و لجستیک از آن، از نمودهای بارز این راهبرد جدید است. ادبیات تحقیق حاکی از آن است که رابطه بین داعش و منافع آمریکا به‌تفصیل موردمطالعه قرارگرفته است اما بعد از حذف فیزیکی داعش توسط قدرت‌های منطقه‌ای و محور مقاومت، تحقیق نظام‌یافته‌ای بر روی راهبرد آمریکا در فضای پساداعش صورت نگرفته است. ازاین‌رو تحقیق حاضر تلاشی است تا با اتخاذ مبانی نظریه مجموعه امنیت منطقه‌ای و روش تحقیق سند پژوهی ، مؤلفه‌های قدرت مقاومت و خلافت مجازی آمریکا در پسا-فیزیک داعش را به‌صورت مقایسه‌ای بررسی کند. نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق نشان داد که در فضای پساداعش، ساختار سازی مقاومت در مقایسه با ائتلاف‌سازی آمریکایی تفوق داشته است. همچنین ماهیت پراگماتیک مقاومت توانسته است کنش‌های لژیون سینتیک نظامی آمریکا را با شکست راهبردی مواجه کند. علاوه بر آن، تلاش آمریکا برای احیای خلافت مجازی داعش از طریق رسانه و پروپاگاندا در مقایسه با واقعیت‌های هلال شیعی شکست‌خورده است. نتایج این تحقیق برای محققان رشته‌های علوم سیاسی و مطالعات منطقه‌ای و راهبرد سازان نظری و نظامی کاربرد دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Analysis of Elements of Resistance Pragmatics and Virtual Caliphate of U.S in Post-ISIS on the Basis of Regional Security Complex Theory

نویسنده [English]

  • Mahmood Mosavi

a

چکیده [English]

Research findings have shown that U.S strategy toward western Asia has undergone fundamental changes in recent years. Creating ISIS emerging phenomenon, and providing it with financial, intelligent, military and logistic support is a manifestation of this new strategy. Literature review shows that ISIS and its relation with U.S interests is investigated thoroughly, however, after physical eradication of ISIS by regional powers and axis of resistance, no systematic research is conducted on the U.S strategy in post-ISIS world. Thus, the current research is an attempt to employ the principles of regional security complex theory and adopt documentary research method to investigate resistance power elements and virtual caliphate of U.S in post-ISIS period comparatively. It was revealed that after ISIS, resistance structural development has overpowered U.S coalition making. Also, the pragmatic nature of the resistance has strategically defeated American military kinetic actions. In addition to that, the U.S attempts aimed at recovering the virtual caliphate of ISIS through media and propaganda is blocked by realities of Shiite crescent. This research has implications for researcher in politics, regional studies, and theoretical and military strategists.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Post-ISIS
  • Resistance
  • Pragmatism
  • Iran
  • U.S.A
  • Regional Security Complex
1) Acharya, A. (1992). Regional military-security cooperation in the third world. Journal of peace research, 29 (10. 7-21).
2) Alaaldin, R. (2017). The origins and ascendancy of Iraq's Shiite militias. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 19 (1), 79-83.
3) Ahmady, Gh; Mehrpour, M & Nikooravesh, A. (2016). Organizational Structure. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 230, 455-462.
 4) Anton, M. (2019) ‘The Trump Doctrine’, Foreign Policy. 20 April. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/20/the-trump-doctrine-
bigthink-america-first-nationalism.
5) Bakos, N. (2018). Beyond kinetic operations: a road map to success in Syria and Iraq. Orbis, 62 (3). 473-486.
6) Baron, K. (2017). Mattis: pentagon shifting focus to great power competition –not terrorism. Defense One. January 19.
7) Bentley, M. (2017) .Instability and Incoherence: Trump, Syria, and Chemical Weapons. Critical Studies on Security, 5 (2), 168–172.
8) Buzan, B (1983). People, states, and fear: the national security problem in international relations: University of North Carolina Press.
9) Buzan, B., &Weaver, O (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10) Erickson, J (1999). Observers or advocates: on the political role of security analysts. Cooperation and conflict, 34 (3), 311-330.
11) Friedman, B. (2018). Iran’s Hezbollah Model in Iraq and Syria: Fait Accompli. Orbis, 62 (3), 438-453
12) Jenkins, B. (2017). Bush, Obama and Trump: the evolution of counterterrorist policy since 9/11, International Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
13) Mansour, M. (2019) ‘US Withdrawal, Arab NATO, and How America Can be a “Force for Good”’, Fikra Forum, February. Available from: https://ww.washingtoninstitute.org/fikraforum/view/u.s.-withdrawal-arab-nato-and-how-america-can-be-a-force-for-good1.
14) Meyer, Ch. (2009). International terrorism as a force of homogenization, a constructivist approach to understanding cross-national threat perceptions and responses. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(4), 647-666.
15) Nasr, V (2018). Iran among the Ruins. Foreign Affairs, 97 (2), 108- 118.
16) Norman, G. (2019) ‘Pompeo on Iran's Capture of British-flagged Tanker’,
Fox News, 22 July. Available from: https://www.foxnews.com/world/pompeo-says-uk-must-free-captured-tanker.
17) Pollack, K. (2019) ‘Trump Is Giving Iran More Than It Ever Dreamed Of’, Foreign Policy, 26 September. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.c om/2019/09/26/trump-is-giving-iran-more-than-it-ever-dreamed-of/.
18) Rahman, O. (2015). An analysis of the regional security of south Asia in post 9/11 period: regional security complex theory approach. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus.
19) Schmitt, E & Nordland, R (2018). Amid tzurkish assault, Kurdish forces are drawn away from U.S. fight with ISIS. New York Times, February 28.
20) Tierney, D (2018). A weary Hercules: the United States and the fertile crescent in a post-caliphate era. Orbis, 62 (3), 487-501.
21) Tierney, D (2010). How we fight: crusades, quagmires, and the American way of war .New York: Little, Brown.
22) Yom, S (2020). US foreign policy in the Middle East: the logic of hegemonic retreat. Global Policy, 11(1). 75-84.
23) Waever, O. (2004). New schools in security theory and their origins between core and periphery. Annual meeting of international studies association. Montreal, Canada.
24) Wastnidge, E. (2017).Calling Out Saudi Misadventure. Global Affairs, 3 (2), 165–171.
25) Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46 (2), 396-412.
26) Williams, M.C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: securitization and international politics. International studies quarterly. 47 (4), 514.