Document Type : Original Article

Author

dr

Abstract

Today, soft power has become one of the advantages of political systems in the field of international relations, and the actors of the international environment want to improve their prestige and influence by using the soft face of power in their relations. Exploiting soft power enables them to avoid the financial and human losses caused by the use of hard power, and in this way, they bring the minds and opinions of the international public with them. Countries that have more powerful software components have the possibility to influence more in bilateral or multilateral relations. By raising the question of how the cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran can be analyzed with the approach of soft power, this research has reached the answer that promoting the values of the Islamic Revolution through cultural diplomacy is one of the basic goals of the revolution and the context of its soft power. To explain the problem and answer this question, the theory of soft power was used and it was stated that the values and culture of the Islamic Revolution with universal characteristics such as justice, freedom, independence, arrogance and anti-tyranny, defense of the oppressed and oppressed, And... through various tools of cultural diplomacy such as diplomacy: media, scientific, educational, artistic, tourism, religious and linguistic; and by using the capacity of various organizations, bodies and institutions in charge of culture; and benefiting from efficient human resources; It seeks to create a new order.

Keywords

  1. برگر، پترل و توماس الکمن(1375). ساخت اجتماعی واقعیت: رساله‌ای در جامعه شناسی شناخت، ترجمه فریبرز مجیدی، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.

    حسن خانی، محمد(1384). دیپلماسی فرهنگی و جایگاه آن در سیاست خارجی کشورها، دانش سیاسی، 1(2)، 148-135.

    لی، میانگ جانگ(1390). قدرت نرم چین: استراتژی چین در حال ظهور در سیاست بین‌الملل، ترجمه اصغر قهرمانپور بناب، چاپ اول، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).

    متقی، ابراهیم و افسانه رشاد(1390). نقش قدرت نرم در گسترش بیداری اسلامی خاورمیانه، راهبرد دفاعی، 9(33)، 36-1.

    مشیرزاده، حمیرا(1383). سازه انگاری به عنوان فرا نظریه روابط بین‌الملل، سیاست، 65، 5-124.

    1. Hopf , T(1998). "The Promise of Constructivism in International
    2. J.Lepgold and M. Nincic, Beyond the Ivory Tower: International
    3. Price, R.M and C.Reus-smit(1998). “Dangerous Liasons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism”, European journal of International Relations, 4,3, pp. 61-259.
    4. Onuf, N.G(1989). "World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations" ,Columbia: University of South Carolina Press
    5. Ruggie, J.G.(1998). "Constructing The World Policy: Essays on International Institutionalization", London and New York: Rutledge
    6. Smith, S(2001). "Reflectivist and constructivist Approaches in International Theory", in Baylis and smith, (eds), The Globalization Of World Politics, 2nd edition وOxford and New York: Oxford University Press
    7. P.R. Viotti and M.V. Kauppi(1999). International Relation Theory: Realism. Pluralism and Beyond. Bostan: Allyn and Bacon, H. Wendt "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of Power politics, in Viotti and Kauppi.

     Relations Theory", International security, 23, 1.

     Relations theoty and the Issue of Policy Relevace. Newyork: Colombia University press 2001.