نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
گروه حقوق عمومی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
This century, more than any other time and historical period, has witnessed the beginning of battles flavored with blind fanaticism and stubbornness over childish and fruitless ideas. In this historical confrontation, the story of war often begins with a few excuses or even no excuses and continues and finally ends with a multitude of sorrow, loss, anguish and loss of people.
Regardless of the disasters and unfortunate consequences of war, what is most worthy of reflection and hesitation is paying attention to the basis and core of ideas or theories that come up with the guise of a way to save and get out of the crisis and pave their way as a path-breaking theory, and without any analysis and examination of the reasons and justifications for proposing these ideas and theories, they sit happily among many theoretical and epistemological foundations of the humanities, without being criticized or surgically examined.
Meanwhile, the doctrine of peace through power, or in other words, peace through force (imposed peace), is one of the ideas that logically has inherent inconsistency and inconsistency within itself.
The following article, in a descriptive-analytical manner and assuming the occurrence of a state of war between two or more countries, aims to reveal the inherent and practical inconsistencies of the doctrine of peace by resorting to force, considering the conceptual details of power and the mutual effectiveness of power and rights, and to proceed towards proving the claim that the aforementioned doctrine, rather than being an idea for good
کلیدواژهها English
