Impact of emerging soft powers on Middle East security

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 student

2 a

3 Faculty Member of Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch

Abstract
Abstract

This research analyzes the role of the three emerging soft powers China, India and Russia in the security of the Middle East. Indeed, China is a rising revisionist world power and the second largest economy after the United States. Likewise, Russia has revived its global role as a major power since the 2000s. Also, India is widely regarded as a "rising power". India is now projected to become the third largest economy in the world by 2030. In fact, since Obama issued the Asia-Pivot Strategy in 2012, the Middle East has been concerned about the US commitment to the security of the Persian Gulf. They see emerging powers, especially China and India, as substitutes for the US security role. . 1

This research also examines the clash of strategies of emerging powers. It explains how the strategy shift of rising powers towards the region for energy or geopolitical considerations has affected their potential security role in the Middle East. This research examines the main interests of emerging soft powers in the Middle East: energy, trade and investment relations.

The main argument of this research is that the emerging powers do not develop a coherent strategy for the security of the region, but have short-term policies or approaches, not concrete strategies. The second argument is that emerging powers do not want to provide security in the Middle East region.



K

Keywords


Akin, Andy, “What Do We Know About Russia’s ‘Grand Strategy?’,” The Washington Post, May 2017.
Alterman, Jon B., “The Other Side of the World: China, the United States, and the Struggle for Middle East Security,” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Washington, March 2017, pp. 12–14.
Burchill, Richard, “Russia’s Desire to Develop a ‘Polycentric System of International Relations’,” TRENDS Working Paper No. 4, TRENDS Research & Advisory, Russian Foreign Policy and the GCC, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2016, pp. 31–32.
Department of Defense, “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2017,” Annual Report to Congress, Washington 2017, p. 43.
Dorsey, James A., “China and the Middle East: Venturing into the Maelstrom,” Working Paper Series, No. 296, The Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), March 18, 2016, Singapore, p. 16.
Dutkiewicz, Piotr, “Russia and Gulf Sates—Contours of Underdeveloped Relations,” TRENDS Working Paper No. 4, TRENDS Research & Advisory, Russian Foreign Policy and the GCC, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2016, p. 8.
Facon, Isabelle, “Russia’s National Security Strategy and Military Doctrine and Their Implications for the EU,” European Union, Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies and the European Parliament’s Sub-Committee on Security and Defence In-depth Analysis, February 10, 2017, p. 11.
Gupta, Arvind, “Introduction,” pp. 1–12, in Venkatshamy, Krishnappa and George, Princy (eds.), Grand Strategy for India 2020 and Beyond(New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, first edition,
Heath, Timothy R., et al., The PLA and China’s Rejuvenation: National Security and Military Strategies, Deterrence Concepts, and Combat Capabilities (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2016), pp. 33–34.
Janardhan, N., “China’s Middle East Conundrum and Prospects for Collective Security,” pp. 27–32, in China and the Challenges in Greater Middle East, Conference Report, Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen, 2016, p. 28.
Khatana, Poonam, “The GCC,” pp. 191–202 in Kumaraswamy, P. R. and Roy, Meena Singh (eds.), Persian Gulf 2016–2017: India’s Relations with the Region (New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses and Middle East Institute, first edition, Pentagon Press, 2018), p. 197.
Kumar, Jatin, “Oman,” pp. 101–117, in Kumaraswamy, P. R. and Roy, Meena Singh (eds.), Persian Gulf 2016–2017: India’s Relations with the Region (New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses and Middle East Institute, first edition, Pentagon Press, 2018), p. 109.
Melkumyan, Elena, “A Political History of Relations Between Russia and the Gulf States,” Research Paper, Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies, December 2015, p. 12.
Mishra, Premanand, “Iraq,” pp. 71–84, in Kumaraswamy, P. R. and Roy, Meena Singh (eds.), Persian Gulf 2016–2017: India’s Relations with the Region (New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses and Middle East Institute, first edition, Pentagon Press, 2018), pp. 128.88 A. A.-D. ARAFAT
Miyake, Kuni, “China as a Middle East Power: The Pros and Cons of a More Assertive and Capable China in the Gulf and Beyond,” China’s Bluewater Navy Series, Center for a New American Security, Washington, March 2017), p. 4.
Renz, Bettina, “Why Russia Is Reviving Its Conventional Military Power,” Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2016, pp. 23–36 (p. 30).
Sladden, James, et al., “Russian Strategy in the Middle East,” RAND Corporation, 2017, p. 5–6.
Soliev, Nodirbek, “Growing Uighur Militancy: Challenges for China,” RSIS Commentary, No. 27, Rajaratnam School of International Studies(RSIS), Singapore, February 4, 2016, p. 1.
Sørensen, Camilla T. N. (ed.), “China in Search of ‘Legitimate’ Great Power Intervention,” Conference Report, Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Denmark, 2016. International Crisis Group, Central Asia’s Silk Road Rivalries International Crisis Group, Europe and Central Asia Report No. 245, July 27, 2017, p. 5.
Sullivan, Paul, “Does China Enhance Stability in the Middle East?” p. 43; Daojiong, Zha and Meidan, Michal, “China and the Middle East in a New Energy Landscape,” Research Paper, Asia Programme, Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, October 2015, pp. 11–12.
Trenin, Dmitri, Russian in the Middle East: Moscow’s Objectives, Priorities and Policy Drivers (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2016), p. 1.
Zou, Zhiqiang, “Oil and Beyond: Sino-Saudi Strategic Economic Relationship,” International Journal of African and Asian Studies, Vol. 16, 2015, pp. 49–57 (pp. 50–51).