The outbreak of Quaid 19 has left the world in a precarious crisis; the unique features of the coronavirus, its speed and ease of transmission, have taken governments by surprise and made them unable to control the crisis, resulting in almost none. One state did not perform well in crisis management, but the world saw a wide range of governments in crisis management; an examination of how governments deal with this crisis shows that there is a link between the rule of politics and liberal economics. Weaknesses and poor performance of governments in crisis management, on the other hand, have been directly linked, and liberal economies are least prepared to curb the Corona crisis. They have shown themselves. In Iran, on the one hand, the structure of the political system, the position of morality in the religious government and the social responsibilities of the government helped reduce human casualties, and on the other hand, some infrastructural barriers such as economic weakness and inability of the government to provide financial assistance to employers. It became ineffective and passive in dealing with the crisis. In this study, a combination (quantitative and qualitative) and analytical methods were used and the data were collected through library studies.governments will face increasing expectations of communities to compensate for the damages, and they will inevitably have to increase their intervention in the economy and their social responsibilities.