<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>basijasatid</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Soft power Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5580</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Resilience Against Cognitive Warfare; Redefining the Role of Critical Thinking Education as a Defensive Shield for Students in the Information Age</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Resilience Against Cognitive Warfare; Redefining the Role of Critical Thinking Education as a Defensive Shield for Students in the Information Age</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>69</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>97</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">241375</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moradi Bahmaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Imam Hussain (AS)</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0009-8162-8599</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In the digital age, cognitive warfare has widely targeted students’ thoughts and feelings through tools such as fake news, propaganda, and algorithmic manipulation. Students, as active users of cyberspace and consumers of educational-media content, are exposed to cognitive and emotional harms caused by cognitive warfare. Lack of sufficient resilience against these threats disrupts not only their academic performance but also their mental health and social participation. This study, focusing on the role of critical thinking as a defensive shield, examines strategies for strengthening students’ resilience in the face of cognitive warfare. The aim of this study is to explore students’ lived experiences of facing cognitive warfare and to explain the role of critical thinking education in building resilience. The research was conducted using an interpretive phenomenological method and semi-structured interviews with 15 undergraduate graduates of public universities. Data were collected based on the participants’ individual experiences and analyzed using the approach of Dickelman et al. The coding process was carried out in three stages: open, axial, and selective, and MAXQDA software was used to organize the data. The findings showed that students who use critical thinking skills are more resilient to manipulated information. The results of this study emphasize the need to integrate critical thinking training into university curricula.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In the digital age, cognitive warfare has widely targeted students’ thoughts and feelings through tools such as fake news, propaganda, and algorithmic manipulation. Students, as active users of cyberspace and consumers of educational-media content, are exposed to cognitive and emotional harms caused by cognitive warfare. Lack of sufficient resilience against these threats disrupts not only their academic performance but also their mental health and social participation. This study, focusing on the role of critical thinking as a defensive shield, examines strategies for strengthening students’ resilience in the face of cognitive warfare. The aim of this study is to explore students’ lived experiences of facing cognitive warfare and to explain the role of critical thinking education in building resilience. The research was conducted using an interpretive phenomenological method and semi-structured interviews with 15 undergraduate graduates of public universities. Data were collected based on the participants’ individual experiences and analyzed using the approach of Dickelman et al. The coding process was carried out in three stages: open, axial, and selective, and MAXQDA software was used to organize the data. The findings showed that students who use critical thinking skills are more resilient to manipulated information. The results of this study emphasize the need to integrate critical thinking training into university curricula.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Resilience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cognitive warfare</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">critical thinking</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">phenomenological method</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.spba.ir/article_241375_6bba7d0617c4a0739884d509ccee590a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
